Top 41 Slang For Bipartisan – Meaning & Usage

In a world where political divides seem to grow wider by the day, understanding the language of bipartisanship can be crucial. Whether you’re a political junkie or just someone looking to navigate the current climate, we’ve got you covered. Join us as we break down the top slang terms for bipartisan cooperation and shed light on this important aspect of governance.

Click above to generate some slangs

1. Across the aisle

This phrase refers to the act of politicians from different parties working together and finding common ground on an issue.

For example, a news article might report, “In a rare display of bipartisanship, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle came together to pass the bill.”
During a debate, a politician might say, “We need to put aside our differences and work across the aisle to find a solution.”
A political analyst might comment, “The success of any legislation depends on the ability of politicians to reach across the aisle and build consensus.”

2. Middle ground

This term refers to finding a position or solution that is neither too far to the left nor too far to the right on the political spectrum.

For instance, a journalist might write, “The candidate’s platform appeals to voters who are looking for a middle ground between progressive and conservative policies.”
During a discussion, someone might say, “We need to find a middle ground that satisfies both sides of the debate.”
A political commentator might argue, “In order to achieve meaningful change, we must be willing to meet in the middle ground and find common-sense solutions.”

3. Unity ticket

This term refers to a scenario where politicians from different parties come together to run as a joint ticket, usually in an effort to challenge a common opponent.

For example, a headline might read, “Two former rivals join forces on a unity ticket to challenge the incumbent.”
During a campaign rally, a candidate might announce, “I am proud to be part of a unity ticket that represents the best interests of all Americans.”
A political strategist might advise, “Forming a unity ticket can help broaden the appeal and reach of a campaign.”

4. Two-party system

This term refers to a political system where power is concentrated in the hands of two major political parties, often leading to a lack of representation for alternative viewpoints.

For instance, a political scientist might explain, “The United States operates under a two-party system, with the Democratic and Republican parties being the dominant forces.”
During a discussion about electoral systems, someone might say, “A two-party system can limit the choices available to voters and stifle the growth of third parties.”
A historian might comment, “The establishment of a two-party system in the early years of the United States was influenced by the Founding Fathers’ differing visions for the country.”

5. Nonpartisan

This term refers to individuals, organizations, or actions that are neutral and do not favor any specific political party.

For example, a news article might describe a think tank as “a nonpartisan research organization that provides unbiased analysis.”
During a debate, a moderator might be introduced as “a nonpartisan figure who will ensure fair and balanced discussions.”
A voter might express their preference for nonpartisan candidates, saying, “I want someone who can represent all constituents, regardless of party affiliation.”

6. Centrist

A centrist refers to a person who holds moderate political views and is open to ideas and policies from both the left and right. They typically seek common ground and compromise.

For example, a centrist might say, “I believe in a balanced approach to economic policies.”
In a political discussion, someone might argue, “We need more centrist politicians who can bridge the divide.”
Another might comment, “Being a centrist means being willing to listen to different perspectives and find middle ground.”

7. Compromise

Compromise refers to the act of finding a mutual agreement or settlement between two parties with differing opinions or interests. It involves giving up certain demands in order to reach a middle ground.

For instance, in a negotiation, someone might say, “Let’s find a compromise that benefits both sides.”
In a political context, a leader might emphasize the importance of compromise by stating, “We must put aside our differences and work towards a compromise.”
Another might discuss the challenges of compromise by saying, “Sometimes compromise means not getting everything you want, but it’s necessary for progress.”

8. Bipartisanship

Bipartisanship refers to the cooperation or collaboration between members of different political parties, particularly in reaching a common goal or passing legislation. It involves setting aside partisan differences in favor of working together.

For example, a politician might say, “We need more bipartisanship in Congress to address the pressing issues of our time.”
In a news article, a journalist might discuss the importance of bipartisanship in finding solutions by stating, “Bipartisanship is key to achieving meaningful change.”
Another might highlight a successful example of bipartisanship by stating, “The recent infrastructure bill was the result of bipartisan efforts to improve our nation’s infrastructure.”

9. Consensus

Consensus refers to a general agreement or shared opinion among a group of people. It involves finding common ground and reaching a decision that is acceptable to all parties involved.

For instance, in a meeting, someone might say, “Let’s strive for consensus on this issue.”
In a discussion about policy-making, a participant might argue, “Consensus-building is essential for effective governance.”
Another might highlight the challenges of reaching consensus by stating, “Finding consensus can be difficult when there are strongly held opposing views.”

10. Coalition

A coalition refers to an alliance or partnership formed by different individuals or groups with a shared goal or purpose. It involves working together towards a common objective, often in the political or social realm.

For example, in a political campaign, a candidate might form a coalition of supporters from different backgrounds.
In a news article, a journalist might discuss the formation of a coalition to address a specific issue by stating, “Various organizations have come together to form a coalition against climate change.”
Another might highlight the strength of a coalition by stating, “Through coalition-building, we can amplify our voices and create meaningful change.”

11. Meeting in the middle

This phrase refers to finding a middle ground or reaching an agreement between two opposing parties or individuals. It suggests that both sides are willing to make concessions to achieve a common goal.

For example, in a political negotiation, someone might say, “We need to meet in the middle and find a solution that benefits everyone.”
In a discussion about resolving a conflict, one might suggest, “Let’s try meeting in the middle and finding a compromise that satisfies both parties.”
A journalist might write, “The two leaders met in the middle and reached a compromise on the controversial issue.”

12. Cross-party

This term describes actions or individuals that involve or include members from different political parties. It emphasizes the idea of collaboration and cooperation across party lines.

For instance, a political event might be advertised as a “cross-party discussion” to encourage participation from members of all parties.
In a news article, a reporter might write, “The cross-party committee was formed to address the pressing issue.”
A politician might advocate for a cross-party approach, saying, “We need to put aside our differences and work together in a cross-party manner to find solutions.”

13. Working across party lines

This phrase highlights the act of politicians or individuals from different political parties coming together to work on a common goal or address a specific issue. It emphasizes the importance of setting aside political differences for the greater good.

For example, a news headline might read, “Senators are working across party lines to pass a bipartisan bill.”
In a political speech, a leader might say, “We must prioritize working across party lines to find solutions that benefit the entire nation.”
A commentator might discuss the challenges of working across party lines, saying, “It requires compromise and open-mindedness to successfully collaborate with members of other parties.”

14. Shared purpose

This term refers to a goal or objective that is mutually desired or agreed upon by multiple parties, regardless of their political affiliations. It emphasizes the importance of finding common ground and working towards a shared vision.

For instance, in a political campaign, a candidate might emphasize the importance of a shared purpose, saying, “We all want a better future for our country.”
In a debate, a participant might argue, “We need to focus on our shared purpose of improving the economy instead of getting caught up in partisan politics.”
A journalist might write, “The two leaders found common ground and worked towards their shared purpose of promoting environmental sustainability.”

15. Bridge-building

This phrase describes the act of creating connections or fostering cooperation between individuals or groups with different viewpoints or ideologies. It emphasizes the idea of building bridges and finding common ground to promote understanding and collaboration.

For example, a community organizer might engage in bridge-building activities to bring together diverse groups for meaningful dialogue.
In a political context, a leader might be praised for their bridge-building skills, with supporters saying, “They have a talent for finding common ground and bringing people together.”
A commentator might discuss the importance of bridge-building in a divided society, saying, “We need leaders who can bridge the gap and foster cooperation between different factions.”

16. Inclusive

When discussing politics, being inclusive means considering and representing the perspectives and interests of all parties or groups involved.

For example, a politician might say, “We need to take an inclusive approach to policy-making in order to address the needs of all our constituents.”
During a debate, a moderator might ask, “How do you plan to create an inclusive government that represents the interests of all citizens?”
A political commentator might argue, “Inclusive policies are essential for fostering unity and progress in a diverse society.”

17. Unified approach

A unified approach refers to a strategy or plan in which different parties or groups work together towards a common goal or objective.

For instance, a political party might say, “We need a unified approach to tackle the pressing issues facing our nation.”
When discussing a joint effort, a leader might state, “We must take a unified approach to address the challenges of climate change.”
A political analyst might comment, “A unified approach is crucial for passing bipartisan legislation and achieving meaningful change.”

18. Dual-party

The term “dual-party” refers to a situation or system in which two political parties are involved or have influence.

For example, a journalist might write, “The dual-party system in this country often leads to polarized politics.”
When discussing a coalition government, a politician might say, “This is a dual-party arrangement that requires compromise and collaboration.”
A political scientist might explain, “The dual-party system can foster healthy competition and provide voters with diverse options.”

19. Finding common ground

Finding common ground means seeking agreement or shared interests among different parties or groups, especially in a political context.

For instance, a negotiator might say, “Let’s focus on finding common ground to reach a compromise.”
During a debate, a candidate might emphasize, “We need to find common ground on issues that affect all Americans.”
A political commentator might argue, “Finding common ground is essential for bridging the partisan divide and achieving bipartisan solutions.”

20. Middle of the road

The phrase “middle of the road” refers to a moderate or centrist position that avoids extreme or polarized views.

For example, a politician might describe their stance as “taking a middle of the road approach to healthcare reform.”
When discussing political ideologies, a commentator might say, “He’s known for his middle of the road policies that appeal to a broad range of voters.”
A voter might express their preference for a middle of the road candidate, stating, “I believe in finding common-sense solutions that lie in the middle of the road.”

21. Consensus-building

The act of working together to reach an agreement or compromise that satisfies all parties involved. Consensus-building is an important aspect of bipartisan politics, as it allows different perspectives to be considered and incorporated into decision-making processes.

For example, in a discussion about healthcare reform, a politician might emphasize the need for consensus-building to create a plan that benefits both sides.
A news article might highlight a successful consensus-building effort between Democrats and Republicans on a particular issue.
A political analyst might argue that consensus-building is crucial for effective governance in a divided political climate.

22. Cross-party cooperation

The act of collaboration between members of different political parties in order to achieve a common goal or address a specific issue. Cross-party cooperation is an essential element of bipartisan politics, as it allows for the exchange of ideas and perspectives from different ideological backgrounds.

For instance, during a legislative debate, politicians might emphasize the need for cross-party cooperation to pass important legislation.
A news article might highlight examples of successful cross-party cooperation on specific policy initiatives.
A political commentator might argue that cross-party cooperation is necessary to address complex and divisive issues.

23. Harmony politics

An approach to politics that emphasizes the importance of harmony, unity, and cooperation between different political parties and ideologies. Harmony politics seeks to bridge the divide between opposing viewpoints and find common ground for the betterment of society.

For example, a politician might advocate for harmony politics in a campaign speech, emphasizing the need for unity and cooperation in addressing pressing issues.
A news article might discuss the benefits of harmony politics in fostering a more inclusive and productive political environment.
A political scientist might analyze the impact of harmony politics on policy outcomes and public perception.

24. Shared values

Shared values refer to the beliefs, principles, and ideals that are held in common by individuals from different political parties or ideological backgrounds. Identifying shared values is an important aspect of bipartisan politics, as it allows for the development of common ground and the potential for collaboration and compromise.

For instance, during a debate, politicians might highlight shared values as a basis for finding bipartisan solutions to complex issues.
A news article might explore the role of shared values in shaping public opinion and political discourse.
A political commentator might argue that focusing on shared values can help bridge the partisan divide and foster productive dialogue.

25. Coalition building

The process of forming alliances and partnerships between individuals or groups with different political ideologies or interests. Coalition building is a key strategy in bipartisan politics, as it allows for the pooling of resources, expertise, and influence to achieve common goals.

For example, during an election campaign, politicians might engage in coalition building to gain support from diverse voter groups.
A news article might discuss successful coalition building efforts between political parties on specific policy initiatives.
A political strategist might outline the benefits and challenges of coalition building in a highly polarized political environment.

26. Teamwork

This refers to the act of working together as a team to achieve a common goal. In the context of bipartisan politics, it means individuals from different parties coming together to find solutions.

For instance, a news article might say, “The success of this bill is a result of bipartisan teamwork.”
In a political speech, a leader might emphasize the importance of teamwork by saying, “We need to put aside our differences and work together for the greater good.”
A political commentator might discuss the lack of teamwork in Congress by stating, “The country is suffering because of the lack of bipartisan collaboration.”

27. Inclusive politics

This term refers to a political approach that aims to include and consider the viewpoints and interests of all individuals, regardless of their political affiliation. It emphasizes the importance of diverse perspectives in decision-making processes.

For example, a politician might discuss the need for inclusive politics by saying, “We must ensure that everyone’s voice is heard and represented in our government.”
A news article might highlight a political leader’s commitment to inclusive politics by stating, “The senator has been a strong advocate for inclusive policies that benefit all citizens.”
A political analyst might criticize a lack of inclusive politics by stating, “The current administration’s policies are exclusionary and do not consider the needs of marginalized communities.”

28. Working in tandem

This phrase refers to the act of working closely and harmoniously with others. In the context of bipartisan politics, it means individuals from different parties collaborating and coordinating their efforts.

For instance, a politician might discuss the importance of working in tandem by saying, “We need to set aside our differences and find common ground for the benefit of the country.”
In a news article about bipartisan legislation, it might be mentioned that “both parties worked in tandem to draft and pass the bill.”
A political commentator might discuss the challenges of working in tandem by stating, “It requires compromise and open communication, but it is crucial for effective governance.”

29. Joint decision-making

This term refers to the process of making decisions collectively, involving input and agreement from individuals of different political affiliations. It emphasizes the importance of finding common ground and reaching agreements that satisfy all parties involved.

For example, a news article might highlight a successful joint decision-making process by stating, “The bipartisan committee reached a consensus on the controversial issue.”
A politician might discuss the benefits of joint decision-making by saying, “When we involve multiple perspectives, we can make better and more balanced decisions.”
A political analyst might criticize a lack of joint decision-making by stating, “The current administration’s unilateral approach ignores the importance of consensus-building and alienates the opposition.”

30. Shared responsibility

This term refers to the idea that individuals from different political parties should share the responsibility for addressing and resolving issues. It emphasizes the importance of holding each other accountable for the outcomes and consequences of political decisions.

For instance, a politician might discuss the concept of shared responsibility by saying, “We cannot point fingers and blame each other. We must all take ownership of the challenges we face.”
In a news article about a bipartisan initiative, it might be mentioned that “both parties recognized their shared responsibility to address the issue.”
A political commentator might criticize a lack of shared responsibility by stating, “The constant blame game only hinders progress and prevents meaningful collaboration.”

31. Joint policy-making

This term refers to the process of creating policies or making decisions that involve the input and cooperation of multiple parties or groups. It emphasizes the idea of working together to find common ground and reach consensus.

For example, “The joint policy-making between the two political parties resulted in a fair and balanced solution.”
In a discussion about effective governance, one might say, “Joint policy-making is crucial for ensuring that diverse perspectives are taken into account.”
A political analyst might note, “Successful joint policy-making requires compromise and a willingness to find middle ground.”

32. Harmony in governance

This phrase describes the state of having a harmonious and cooperative relationship between different political parties or factions. It emphasizes the idea of working together for the greater good and finding common ground in decision-making.

For instance, “Achieving harmony in governance requires politicians to prioritize the needs of the nation over partisan interests.”
In a discussion about effective leadership, one might say, “Harmony in governance leads to better outcomes for the people.”
A political commentator might argue, “Harmony in governance is essential for maintaining stability and promoting progress.”

33. United effort

This term refers to the collective and cooperative actions taken by individuals or groups to work towards a common goal or objective. It emphasizes the idea of unity and solidarity in pursuing shared interests or objectives.

For example, “The successful passage of the bill was the result of a united effort by politicians from both parties.”
In a discussion about effective teamwork, one might say, “A united effort leads to greater productivity and success.”
A political strategist might advise, “To achieve meaningful change, it is important to foster a sense of united effort among stakeholders.”

34. Joint leadership

This phrase describes a leadership style or approach that involves multiple individuals or groups sharing leadership responsibilities and making decisions together. It emphasizes the idea of distributed power and collective decision-making.

For instance, “The joint leadership of the committee ensured that diverse perspectives were taken into account.”
In a discussion about effective governance, one might say, “Joint leadership promotes inclusivity and prevents concentration of power.”
A leadership consultant might advise, “Successful joint leadership requires effective communication and a shared vision.”

35. Harmony in decision-making

This term refers to the process of making decisions that involve the input and agreement of multiple parties or stakeholders. It emphasizes the idea of finding common ground and reaching consensus through open dialogue and negotiation.

For example, “Harmony in decision-making is essential for maintaining political stability and public trust.”
In a discussion about effective decision-making, one might say, “Harmony in decision-making leads to more sustainable and inclusive outcomes.”
A political scientist might argue, “Harmony in decision-making requires a commitment to dialogue, compromise, and shared values.”

36. Mutual collaboration

This term refers to the act of individuals or groups coming together to work on a project or achieve a common goal. It emphasizes the idea of cooperation and teamwork.

For example, “The two parties engaged in mutual collaboration to pass the new bill.”
In a discussion about bipartisan efforts, one might say, “Mutual collaboration is essential for finding common ground.”
A political commentator might argue, “Mutual collaboration between parties can lead to more effective governance.”

37. Joint legislation

This term describes legislation that is supported by members of both political parties. It signifies cooperation and compromise between different political ideologies.

For instance, “The joint legislation on healthcare received overwhelming support from both sides.”
In a news article, one might read, “The passage of joint legislation is seen as a significant achievement in today’s polarized political climate.”
A political analyst might comment, “Joint legislation demonstrates a willingness to put aside partisan differences for the greater good.”

38. Harmony in policy-making

This term refers to the agreement and cooperation between politicians from different parties when formulating policies. It highlights the idea of finding common ground and working together for the benefit of the country.

For example, “The committee achieved harmony in policy-making by incorporating input from both sides.”
In a debate about bipartisan governance, one might argue, “Harmony in policy-making leads to better outcomes for the citizens.”
A political scientist might state, “Harmony in policy-making is crucial for maintaining a functional democracy.”

39. United front in governance

This term signifies the collective effort of politicians from different parties to work together and present a unified approach to governance. It emphasizes the idea of setting aside partisan differences for the sake of effective governance.

For instance, “The leaders displayed a united front in governance, putting the country’s interests above their party affiliations.”
In a news report, one might read, “A united front in governance can lead to more stable and successful administrations.”
A political commentator might note, “A united front in governance is a sign of political maturity and a commitment to serving the people.”

40. Joint decision-making process

This term refers to the practice of involving representatives from both political parties in the decision-making process. It emphasizes the importance of considering diverse perspectives and reaching consensus.

For example, “The joint decision-making process ensured that all voices were heard and taken into account.”
In a discussion about bipartisan governance, one might argue, “The joint decision-making process promotes inclusivity and reduces the risk of partisan bias.”
A political analyst might comment, “The joint decision-making process allows for more balanced and well-rounded policy outcomes.”

41. Putting politics aside

This phrase refers to the act of setting aside political differences in order to focus on shared goals or interests. It implies a willingness to work together and compromise for the greater good.

For example, during a debate, a politician might say, “Let’s put politics aside and work towards a solution that benefits everyone.”
In a discussion about policy, someone might suggest, “We need to put politics aside and focus on what’s best for the country.”
A news article might highlight, “Despite their differences, the two leaders put politics aside to address the urgent issue at hand.”